NASA astronaut and biochemist Peggy Whitson will return to Earth as the planets new record holder for longest time cumulatively spent on space by an American or a. Britains first bitcoin ATM is found in a Shoreditch cafe and bar in east London. IBTimes UK It was inevitable that Shoreditch would become home to the UKs first. At a press conference on Sunday, angry citizens ran off Jason Kessler, the organizer of a disastrous rally for white supremacists, neoNazis and other members of the. Dont Rely On Your Fitbit Or Apple Watch To Tell You How Many Calories You Burn. Its Probably Wrong. If you wear a fitness tracker you probably rely on the data it gives you. You may meticulously track how well you slept, how many steps you took, your heart rate and probably how many calories you burned. Facebook-Insights.jpg' alt='Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' title='Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' />But a study shows the calorie count may not be as accurate as you think. Fitness trackers arent perfect. And though their technology has improved since they first came on the scene, theyre better at tracking some things than other. The reason they have such a hard time with calories burned has a lot to do with how differently your body burns calories compared to someone elses body. Read Fitbits First Smartwatch, Codenamed Higgs, Appears In Leaked Photos. Researchers at Stanford University and the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences found most trackers had the hardest time measuring energy expenditure. That just means a number of calories your body burns throughout the day and during exercise. The study, published Wednesday in the Journal of Personalized Medicine, looked at eight direct to consumer trackers from as many manufacturers, including the Apple Watch and the Fitbit Surge. There were 6. 0 participants 1. The group was made up of 2. The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard Full Movie In English there. The activities that included running, walking and cycling resulted in heart rate levels were reported with an acceptable margin of error. But none of the wrist worn trackers measured or reported energy expenditure, or calories burned, within an acceptable margin of error. Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' title='Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' />Prince Harrys ex Camilla Thurlow is too classy and educated for Love Island say viewers 27yearold sticks out like a sore thumb due to her self respect. Premier League 201718 live streaming Watch Swansea City vs Manchester United live on TV, online. Dont Rely On Your Fitbit Or Apple Watch To Tell You How Many Calories You Burn. Its Probably Wrong. Internet Rumors, Gossip And Misinformation People Only Want To Read What They Already Believe. Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' title='Watch Think Like A Man Too Online Ibtimes' />Of the eight devices, the Apple Watch had the smallest range of error while the Samsung Gear S2 had the biggest. The trackers arent regulated by the government because they arent meant to be used as a source of reliable medical data. Even so, that doesnt stop some insurance companies from using the data to provide wearers with discounts. Read Is Juicing Good For You Detox Health Benefits Reduced By Sugar, Calories In Fruits And Vegetables. The reason the energy expenditure data may be so off has to do with the individuality of users. While the fitness trackers themselves are physically one size fits all in many cases, their software isnt necessarily. Some people have faster metabolisms meaning they burn calories more quickly and can burn more during a day than others. Additionally, certain exercises can boost your metabolism so its not a static facet of the body. Factors like gender, age and weight can all contribute to how quickly you metabolize calories. This could be one reason the trackers couldnt accurately predict calories burned. Some people are incredibly efficient and look incredibly elegant when they run. And others really clearly look like theyre burning a lot more calories to cover the same amount of ground, Euan Ashley, a researcher involved in the study from Stanford told Scientific American. So wearing that tracker wont hurt, but you may need to put in some extra work to find out how many calories youre really burning. People Only Want To Read What They Already Believe. Did you hear the news A mass grave with two dozen bodies was found in Texas. Iran is banning the Internet. South Carolinas Gov. Nikki Haley is under indictment for tax fraud. Jon Bon Jovi is dead. All of these statements are false but were at one time considered to be verified, legitimate facts, believed and shared by many. Worse yet, some people still believe them you cant easily un ring the bell of misinformation. Even when hastily broken news is swiftly retracted or corrected, or when fact checkers quickly untangle, say, a politicians erroneous claim about his opponent, the damage has often been done In a matter of minutes, a story can take on a life of its own regardless of whether or not it is entirely true. Although some would argue that misinformation is a by product of the digital age, thats hardly accurate. Individuals, companies, governments, political activists and organizations have long used dubious versions of the truth as currency. However, more recently, the Internet with its vast reach, inherent anonymity and breakneck content cycles has made spreading gossip and rumors childs play. Yet, none of this would work none of the falsehoods would stick if it werent for a quirk in human nature  We want to hear what we already believe. We watch MSNBC or read the Huffington Post because we want our news tilted leftward. Or we watch Fox News or listen to Rush Limbaugh because we want to see President Barack Obama and social liberals constantly lambasted. Watch Amy Putlocker. In other words, we seek what we consider the truth, and we look for it in digital echo chambers that reflect our internal biases. People want information to confirm what they already think they know, said Alfred Hermida, a digital media scholar and author of Participatory Journalism Guarding Open Gates at Online Journalism. The success of the so called birthers many of whom still dont accept the indisputable fact that Obama is a native born American illustrates this point, Hermida says. Why do people buy one newspaper instead of anotherBecause that newspaper reflects their world outlook more than the competition does. Watch The Third Wheel Download Full. We do this in all of our media choices. Typical of the it sounds true to me so it must be true story is one that, we abashedly admit, was published by IBTimes a month ago. The article, based on an erroneous report, said that Reza Taghipour, the Iranian minister for Information and Communications Technology, had announced plans to remove public Internet access in Iran and replace it with a state controlled national portal. The IBT reporter who broke the story cited an April 5 statement on the Farsi language site Kalame. The story received thousands of page views and was picked up unquestioningly by numerous news outlets before IBT was made aware of an official Iranian denial In a statement to Agence France Presse, the Iranian information ministry called the report completely baseless and attributed it to the propaganda wing of the West. IBT updated the story with the denial by the morning after the first report went live, and it published a follow up story further detailing accusations by Irans information ministry that the report was based on a misunderstood hoax. Still, throughout that day, multiple news outlets continued to cite the original story without qualification it remained the Top News result on a Twitter search for Iran until late afternoon. Even days later, the story which some now believe began as an April Fools joke was still clinging to life. In fact, some people on the Internet remain unconvinced that the ministrys denial of the report truly means public Internet access will not be disrupted by the government. Irans documented history of censorship likely made it easier for audiences to take the false report seriously. Peoples proclivity to believe what they want to hear has found the perfect accomplice in microblogging sites such as Twitter and Tumblr. Without fact checking, legitimate news organizations often report what they read on Twitter and all too frequently and uncritically praise microblogging as an essential tool of modern day reporting making the popular site a digitally amplified game of telephone. In turn, more and more people post misinformation or poorly gathered information on Twitter and other microblogging venues sometimes innocently, in the rush to get ahead of the news, and sometimes maliciously, as a prank or to further a personal agenda. In June 2. 01. 1, an evidently honest but critical oversight led to a seemingly credible report that a mass grave was found in Texas. This salacious item, not surprisingly, quickly went viral. Its origin reportedly was a tipster in the Lincoln Country Sheriffs Office who told a local news station that police were investigating a report of 2. Hardin, Texas. The Houston based station, KPRC TV, promptly sent a message via Twitter claiming that dozens of bodies have been found. Before long, national wire services and news outlets like the New York Times and the Associated Press ran with the story. The Times told its followers on Twitter NYT NEWS ALERT Up to 3. Dismembered Bodies Found Near Houston, Reuters Reports. But when investigators and reporters went to the scene, they found no trace of human remains. A deconstruction of the report revealed that the sheriffs office had initially heard about the bogus burial site from a psychic who had a premonition. The authorities reportedly took the psychics claims seriously because she had detailed and accurate knowledge of the home and the property where she believed the mass grave to be. It is unclear whether the sheriffs office declined to tell the Houston station that its source was a psychic, or if the station ignored or misunderstood the quality of the source. The Texas mass grave story was ultimately an innocent mistake, at least compared to a case of digital journalistic malpractice involving South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley in March, when she was forced to address a damaging rumor claiming that she was facing imminent indictment on tax fraud charges. This rumor was started on a little known news blog with only one reporter. As a subsequent New York Times story explains, on March 2. Logan Smith ran an item on his site, the Palmetto Public Record which describes itself as a South Carolina focused blog about politics and policy that goes beyond inflated political rhetoric and he saidshe said journalism claiming that two well placed legal experts told him that Haley was about to be indicted. Mainstream and widely read news outlets like Buzz. Feed, whose editor is a former top journalist at Politico, and the Washington Post, broadcast a link to Smiths story via Twitter. This immediately elevated an item that would have likely been lost in the Internets din into a legitimately big story in the mainstream news cycle. The news Web is subject to all of the same natural forces as the rest of the Internet, said Ken Doctor, a media analyst and author of Newsonomics Twelve New Trends That Will Shape the News You Get. That means everything right, wrong or otherwise has the potential for getting magnified instantly. The indictment rumor was ultimately discredited after Haleys office released a letter from the Internal Revenue Service denying a pending tax investigation. Still, rather than backing down, Smith doubled down.